Time for a change

LinkedIn +

Test regulations are constantly being updated. Consider the ever-tightening emissions, noise and barrier tests, and how far they’ve come in the last 30-40 years. The perennial problems lie in how the regulations are written, by whom, and how much room there is for interpretation.
If you look at F1, for example, there was a recent debacle over the use of radios. The rules effectively said radio communication could not be used to coach the driver. But this proved unenforceable because of the grey area between coaching and advising the driver of a safety issue. As such, that rule was rapidly scrapped.

Things don’t move quite so quickly in the automotive test world, though. There has been much debate of late about lab emissions and real-world emissions, with particular reference to how emission performance behaves outside the defined test cycles.

It’s obvious to all who play the game that there can be no all-encompassing test cycle, but most would agree that lab tests provide the best repeatability for vehicle-to-vehicle comparisons.

It is also known that emission strategies are based around the test cycles. This is a fact of life, not a condemnation.

To prove this point, try running a Japanese spec car on a Euro 5 cycle. The emissions fall off the table above 90km/h, because the Japanese cycle is unregulated above that speed. Similarly, the US FTP 75 cycle only goes to 89km/h.

The question therefore becomes, how do you make the test cycle as representative as possible, and cover as wide a range of operation as possible? Firstly, let’s consider the cycle itself.

Back in 1968 a man climbed into a car in Los Angeles and recorded a 30-minute drive around the city. This was done under the LA4 drive cycle, which became the FTP72 test protocol. The test was split into two parts, the initial 505 seconds for the cold start, and the rest for the warmed-up engine.

Today, the cycle might be considered out of date as a drive pattern for LA’s current road network, but at least it’s taken from a real-world drive.

The European cycle is, by contrast, a series of constant rate accelerations and steady-state cruises. Hardly representative. This anomaly should be improved with the new worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedures (WLTP) cycle currently under development, but this also brings me to a second point.
Back in 1975 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) realized that cars do one cold start a day and many hot starts. So it changed the cycle by adding a 10-minute soak and hot restart repeating the 505-second cycle. This became, and remains, the FTP75 cycle. The EU cycle has never included a hot restart phase, and the new WLTP cycle doesn’t have one either. A grave omission on all levels.

Where the EU cycle was updated for the better was with the introduction of the extra urban driving cycle (EUDC), which raised the maximum speed to 120km/h, 8km/h over the legal speed limit, thereby covering the full legal speed range of the vehicle.

The cold start soak temperature is currently set at 20-30°C, which is pretty good for LA, but not quite right for places such as Birmingham in the UK. Here, the problem is facility based.

Keeping a parking garage at 20-30°C all year round is relatively straightforward when the outside ambient is rarely, if ever, above 30°C. However, holding a large facility at a much lower temperature than ambient would require a large air-con plant with the resultant CO₂ emissions that everyone is so worried about. The introduction of the -7°C test placates this issue somewhat, but a +5°C to +10°C start temperature would cover a larger section of the real-world operating fleet.

My third point is one of great contention following the recent diesel scandals. Specifically, why are gasoline and diesel limits different? In simple terms, they shouldn’t be. This particular problem didn’t really raise its head when the bulk of the passenger car market was gasoline-powered, but government pressure on OEMs to tackle CO₂ back in 2003 lead to diesels being given tax breaks over gasoline. This was allowed to happen even though the legal NOx limit at that time was almost four times higher for diesel than for gasoline, never mind the particulates. In 2014, the limit gap was closed to just under three times higher, still hardly a level playing field.

Test cycles continue to evolve, but they’ll never really be perfect. The general public needs to understand this, but they also need a clear, honest and, above all, simple explanation of what can be done, what should be done and what is impractical – either because of existing technology or critical cost factors.
Mark Berry: Itinerant development engineer, apprenticed at Rolls-Royce, prior to five-year-long spells at both Jaguar Land Rover and Lotus before 25 years as a “jobbing engineer” specialist in EMS calibration and emissions, while being widely conversant in most aspects of type approval. Particular skills in managing climatic and altitude field test programs.

Share this story:



131 Comments

  1. Pingback: sleep lotion

  2. Pingback: allergies

  3. Pingback: valentines gift

  4. Pingback: valentines gift

  5. Pingback: personalized baby

  6. Pingback: valentine pillow

  7. Pingback: personalized pillow cover

  8. Pingback: Click Here

  9. Pingback: Click Here

  10. Pingback: Click Here

  11. Pingback: Click Here

  12. Pingback: Click Here

  13. Pingback: Click Here

  14. Pingback: Click Here

  15. Pingback: Click Here

  16. Pingback: Click Here

  17. Pingback: Click Here

  18. Pingback: Click Here

  19. Pingback: Click Here

  20. Pingback: Click Here

  21. Pingback: Click Here

  22. Pingback: Click Here

  23. Pingback: Click Here

  24. Pingback: Click Here

  25. Pingback: Click Here

  26. Pingback: Click Here

  27. Pingback: Click Here

  28. Pingback: Click Here

  29. Pingback: Click Here

  30. Pingback: Click Here

  31. Pingback: Click Here

  32. Pingback: Click Here

  33. Pingback: Click Here

  34. Pingback: spaceros

  35. Pingback: fundamentals of robotics

  36. Pingback: no code robotics

  37. Pingback: Click Here

  38. Pingback: Click Here

  39. Pingback: Click Here

  40. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  41. Pingback: Click Here

  42. Pingback: Click Here

  43. Pingback: Click Here

  44. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  45. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  46. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  47. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  48. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  49. Pingback: Click Here

  50. Pingback: Click Here

  51. Pingback: Click Here

  52. Pingback: Click Here

  53. Pingback: Click Here

  54. Pingback: Click Here

  55. Pingback: Click Here

  56. Pingback: Click Here

  57. Pingback: Click Here

  58. Pingback: Click Here

  59. Pingback: Click Here

  60. Pingback: Click Here

  61. Pingback: Click Here

  62. Pingback: Click Here

  63. Pingback: Click Here

  64. Pingback: Click Here

  65. Pingback: Click Here

  66. Pingback: feuerzeug

  67. Pingback: Click Here

  68. Pingback: Click Here

  69. Pingback: grand rapids same day crowns

  70. Pingback: grand rapids teeth whitening

  71. Pingback: grand rapids dentist

  72. Pingback: Click Here

  73. Pingback: Click Here

  74. Pingback: Click Here

  75. Pingback: https://gquery.org/

  76. Pingback: Click Here

  77. Pingback: Click Here

  78. Pingback: Click Here

  79. Pingback: Click Here

  80. Pingback: Click Here

  81. Pingback: Click Here

  82. Pingback: Click Here

  83. Pingback: 인터넷카지노사이트

  84. Pingback: Click Here

  85. Pingback: Click Here

  86. Pingback: Click Here

  87. Pingback: Click Here

  88. Pingback: Click Here

  89. Pingback: Click Here

  90. Pingback: Click Here

  91. Pingback: Click Here

  92. Pingback: refer and earn site

  93. Pingback: Click Here

  94. Pingback: Click Here

  95. Pingback: Click Here

  96. Pingback: Click Here

  97. Pingback: Click Here

  98. Pingback: Click Here

  99. Pingback: Click Here

  100. Pingback: Click Here

  101. Pingback: Click Here

  102. Pingback: Click Here

  103. Pingback: Click Here

  104. Pingback: Click Here

  105. Pingback: Click Here

  106. Pingback: Click Here

  107. Pingback: Click Here

  108. Pingback: Click Here

  109. Pingback: 무료 카지노 게임

  110. Pingback: 신뢰할 수 있는 카지노 사이트

  111. Pingback: 최고 등급 카지노 사이트

  112. Pingback: premium-domains

  113. Pingback: premium-domain-name

  114. Pingback: best start up books

  115. Pingback: comic book leggings

  116. Pingback: upcoming cardano nft projects

  117. Pingback: cardano stake pool ranking

  118. Pingback: post rent ad for free

  119. Pingback: best website for small business

  120. Pingback: Google reviews

  121. Pingback: Start OnlyFans Australia

  122. Pingback: reputation defenders

  123. Pingback: fundos imobiliários para iniciante

  124. Pingback: 2023 Books

  125. Pingback: death redcords

  126. Pingback: death

  127. Pingback: burial

  128. Pingback: search dececased

  129. Pingback: online memorial

  130. Pingback: cemetery

  131. Pingback: IRA Empire