The doctrine of crashworthiness

LinkedIn +

My previous column was, even by my own standards, something of a despondent rant. It was about how regulations and standards are helpful design parameters, but risk outranks them both. The risk here is real-world events – or accidents as plaintiffs like to call them. And it was about how, if the accident happens in the USA, the vehicle involved will be subjected to a crashworthiness test. This situation is not without irony. Consider this. At the embryo stage, the integrity of the design and build are subjected to a crashworthiness test performed by competent, experienced engineers in a controlled environment. But then, post-accident, the same test is carried out by a jury who are incompetent, inexperienced and in an uncontrolled environment. This doesn’t always end well.
In 1968 General Motors was sued by a plaintiff called Larsen. The US court decided that accidents are foreseeable to OEMs, so cars must be made crashworthy and any injuries caused by the lack of crashworthiness must be compensated for by the OEM. This is regardless of the cause of the accident itself. And it even applies in ‘pilot error’ cases, where the root cause and the victim are one and the same. This judgment equated GM to a safety guarantor.

Time, then, to deploy a word I never thought I’d use in this column: jurisprudence. This very grand term simply means legal theory. Since the 1920s, US jurisprudence has been curated as legal theory in books called ‘restatements’. These are so called because each series displaces the last one. Imagine a suite of test protocols, only written by judges for judges – if you get one of these, apply this test. In the late 1980s the third restatement replaced the second one and, by all accounts, it was quite an overhaul. It also dealt a catastrophic blow to OEMs selling products in the USA. It adopted the crashworthiness test from the GM case. And just like that, a test was set for the coming decades. It’s an understatement to say this was a stick for plaintiff’s lawyers to beat OEMs with. It was an assault rifle.

But then, in 2014, came a glimpse of hope for car makers in the USA. In the case of Tincher v. Omega Flex, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided not to adopt the third restatement on product liability law. My firm’s head office is in Philadelphia, so I have an inside perspective on the impression this made on the legal community. It was stunned confusion.

It left me and many of my peers wondering whether this meant that OEMs could now defend claims in the USA just as they could defend them anywhere else in the world. The answer hasn’t exactly proved to be straightforward. For now, in Pennsylvania at least, a plaintiff has two ways to demonstrate that a car is defective. Out goes the crashworthiness test and in comes the ‘consumer expectations’ test and the ‘risk-utility’ test. In the former, a car is deemed defective if it is proved to be more dangerous than a reasonable consumer would expect. In the latter, a car is deemed defective if the chances of harm are proved to outweigh the utility.

Whatever you make of these tests, they seem far better than the crashworthiness test. Honda certainly thinks so. Last year, in a case called Martinez, the OEM set about trying to overturn an award of some US$50m on the basis that the judge had given the jury the wrong instructions by telling them to examine crashworthiness. So, not just pilot error, you could say, but judge error.

Share this story:



144 Comments

  1. Pingback: valentine pillow

  2. Pingback: valentine gift

  3. Pingback: organic antiseptic

  4. Pingback: foot salve

  5. Pingback: personalized baby

  6. Pingback: personalized pillow cover

  7. Pingback: Click Here

  8. Pingback: Click Here

  9. Pingback: Click Here

  10. Pingback: Click Here

  11. Pingback: Click Here

  12. Pingback: Click Here

  13. Pingback: Click Here

  14. Pingback: Click Here

  15. Pingback: Click Here

  16. Pingback: Click Here

  17. Pingback: Click Here

  18. Pingback: Click Here

  19. Pingback: Click Here

  20. Pingback: Click Here

  21. Pingback: Click Here

  22. Pingback: Click Here

  23. Pingback: Click Here

  24. Pingback: Click Here

  25. Pingback: Click Here

  26. Pingback: Click Here

  27. Pingback: remote control robotics

  28. Pingback: robotics case study

  29. Pingback: Click Here

  30. Pingback: no code robotics

  31. Pingback: Click Here

  32. Pingback: Click Here

  33. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  34. Pingback: Click Here

  35. Pingback: Click Here

  36. Pingback: Click Here

  37. Pingback: Click Here

  38. Pingback: Reputation Defenders

  39. Pingback: Click Here

  40. Pingback: Click Here

  41. Pingback: Click Here

  42. Pingback: Click Here

  43. Pingback: Click Here

  44. Pingback: Click Here

  45. Pingback: Click Here

  46. Pingback: Click Here

  47. Pingback: Click Here

  48. Pingback: Click Here

  49. Pingback: Click Here

  50. Pingback: Click Here

  51. Pingback: Click Here

  52. Pingback: Click Here

  53. Pingback: Click Here

  54. Pingback: grand rapids dentist

  55. Pingback: grand rapids teeth whitening

  56. Pingback: Click Here

  57. Pingback: Click Here

  58. Pingback: https://gquery.org/

  59. Pingback: Click Here

  60. Pingback: Click Here

  61. Pingback: Click Here

  62. Pingback: Click Here

  63. Pingback: Click Here

  64. Pingback: Click Here

  65. Pingback: Click Here

  66. Pingback: Click Here

  67. Pingback: Click Here

  68. Pingback: Click Here

  69. Pingback: Click Here

  70. Pingback: Click Here

  71. Pingback: Click Here

  72. Pingback: Referral Code

  73. Pingback: Click Here

  74. Pingback: Click Here

  75. Pingback: Click Here

  76. Pingback: Click Here

  77. Pingback: Click Here

  78. Pingback: Click Here

  79. Pingback: Click Here

  80. Pingback: Click Here

  81. Pingback: Click Here

  82. Pingback: Click Here

  83. Pingback: Click Here

  84. Pingback: Click Here

  85. Pingback: 신뢰할 수 있는 카지노 사이트

  86. Pingback: 실제 현금 카지노

  87. Pingback: premium-domain-names

  88. Pingback: best-domains

  89. Pingback: small business blogs

  90. Pingback: limited company setup

  91. Pingback: Google reviews

  92. Pingback: Porn babes australia

  93. Pingback: reputation defenders

  94. Pingback: 2023 Books

  95. Pingback: burial place

  96. Pingback: family member

  97. Pingback: cemetery location

  98. Pingback: low risk football trading strategies

  99. Pingback: Chirurgiens esthétique Tunisie

  100. Pingback: Chirurgiens esthétique Tunisie

  101. Pingback: Chirurgie Tunisie

  102. Pingback: National Chi Nan University

  103. Pingback: Inclusiveness

  104. Pingback: Private university

  105. Pingback: نجاح الهيئة التدريسية

  106. Pingback: افضل جامعة في مصر

  107. Pingback: future university

  108. Pingback: Transparency and credibility

  109. Pingback: كلية إدارة الأعمال في مصر

  110. Pingback: MBA scholarships in Egypt

  111. Pingback: Business education in Egypt

  112. Pingback: Accounting research

  113. Pingback: Public administration

  114. Pingback: Political mass media

  115. Pingback: fue

  116. Pingback: International Relations

  117. Pingback: ما هي مميزات كلية الصيدلة

  118. Pingback: Vortex

  119. Pingback: Contact Information Faculty of pharmacy

  120. Pingback: Vacuum pumps

  121. Pingback: Course Load

  122. Pingback: Wisdom Teeth Extraction

  123. Pingback: طب الفم والأسنان

  124. Pingback: Get in Touch with Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine

  125. Pingback: الزيارات العلمية

  126. Pingback: Global Impact

  127. Pingback: Electrical Engineering

  128. Pingback: computer science internships

  129. Pingback: Grading Policy

  130. Pingback: Department of Computer Engineering

  131. Pingback: Computer Science Internships

  132. Pingback: FCIT Undergraduate Programs

  133. Pingback: best university in egypt

  134. Pingback: Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine

  135. Pingback: best university in egypt

  136. Pingback: ما هو افضل تخصص في ادارة الاعمال

  137. Pingback: Dental Residency Programs

  138. Pingback: Business school in Egypt

  139. Pingback: دراسة ادارة الاعمال بجامعة المستقبل

  140. Pingback: Faculty of dentistry

  141. Pingback: كلية إدارة الأعمال في مصر

  142. Pingback: امتحانات القبول لجامعة المستقبل

  143. Pingback: رسوم التقديم لجامعة المستقبل

  144. Pingback: fue collaborations