Supplier Spotlight

Show Reviews

Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2017 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2016 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2015 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo North America 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo India 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Latest Video

Engineering down under


Take a tour of the Australian Automotive Research Centre in Melbourne, which covers a 1,000ha area, and encompasses a raft of test roads and surfaces – including a 4.2km hot mixed surface road

Click here to watch the video

Creating the GM Electrovan


Floyd Wyczalek, project manager for the GM Electrovan, recalls his work on the world's first fuel cell vehicle in 1966, and takes a retrospective look at the development of fuel cell technology since.

Click here to watch the video

From a testing perspective, who stands to benefit most from PSA's acquisition of Opel?

Industry Opinion

« back to blog listings

Security alert

When it comes to testing the components of modern connected cars, of course pen-testing (penetration testing) has its place; however, it is no substitute for solid product development.

In testing, companies often operate under the notion that an identified problem can be fixed or patched. This may be true for some areas of testing, but for security, it is not sufficient. Security needs to be built-in, from the ground up. And that means starting at the hardware layer, which is seldom done today, but which is completely viable given the advancements in silicon and other connected vehicle technologies.

In fact, the prpl Foundation has produced a guide on how to secure critical areas of embedded computing that advocates the use of open, interoperable protocols and APIs, exercising security by separation, through implementing hardware virtualization and anchoring a root of trust in silicon.

Looking back at all of the recent public cases of researchers hacking connected cars, they all share the exploitation of proprietary code. This idea that closed, proprietary systems can work within Internet of Things and connected devices is a myth. In contrast, an open security framework means it has constantly been tested and had many eyes cast over it to ensure its strength.

The second thing they all have in common is that once hackers were able to reverse engineer vendor-specific code to gain access to one area of the system, they proceeded to move around laterally to other networked components. This idea that once an actor can gain access to a non-critical component in a vehicle, such as the entertainment system, and then work their way into a critical area, such as the steering, is scary to think about. But without using the time tested method of security by separation, it is a reality. This separation can be achieved by using hardware virtualization so that although independently they might not be more secure, as a system, one bad apple doesn’t compromise the whole system.

Finally, all of these security controls need to be tied to a root of trust in silicon; this can be a by-product of the hypervisor used in creating hardware virtualization or by some other method. One neat area being explored by prpl at the moment is physical unclonable function (PUF) technology that can extract a unique identifier from the silicon itself, much like a fingerprint, to provide authentication and establish a root of trust.

In summary, pen-testing is important, but it is no replacement for sound product development. Security can only be forged from the ground up in the silicon of connected components themselves. It cannot be added as an afterthought as we have seen time and time again. Testing alone does not make a product secure. From a risk management perspective, testing lowers the risk but doesn’t completely remove it. After all, upon successful testing one can say, “I couldn’t find anything wrong,” which is not the same as saying, “There is nothing wrong.”

Cesare Garlati, formerly VP of mobile security at Trend Micro, currently serves as chief security strategist at prpl Foundation and co-chair of the mobile working group at Cloud Security Alliance.

Prior to Trend Micro, Garlati held director positions within leading mobility companies such as iPass, Smith Micro Software and WaveMarket. Before this, he was senior manager of product development at Oracle, where he led the development of Oracle’s first cloud application and many other modules of the Oracle E-Business Suite.

October 18, 2016



There are currently no comments.

If you would like to post a comment about this blog, please click here.
Read Latest Issue
Read Latest Issue

Web Exclusives

Conti celebrates 50th anniversary of the Contidrom

The German tire giant looks back on 50 years of testing and development at its flagship facility
Click here to read more

Cruden launches new simulator technology

The system designed for ADAS and autonomous vehicle testing enables engineers to add as much hardware- or software-in-the-loop as they wish
Click here to read more

Q&A: Michael Guerrero, senior research engineer, Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center

Guerrero reveals details of a new component test methodology being developed at HATCHI
Click here to read more

Q&A: Dr Reza Bihamta, CAE expert, General Motors

Bihamta discusses the latest challenges in the simulation of joining techniques
Click here to read more

In-dummy data acquisition

Kistler’s digital transducer interface technology is enabling Continental Safety Engineering to yield data quicker and more accurately than ever before
Click here to read more

Supplier Spotlight

Supplier SpotlightClick here for listings and information on leading suppliers covering all aspects of the automotive testing industry. Want to see your company included? Contact for more details.

فروشگاه اینترنتی فروشگاه اینترنتی سیستم همکاری در فروش ماهواره آنلاین اندروید کانال تلگرام چت روم دانلود فیلم فروشگظ;ه اینترنتی

Submit your industry opinion

Industry BlogDo you have an opinion you'd like to share with the automotive testing community? Good or bad, we'd like to hear your views and opinions on the leading issues shaping the industry. Share your comments by sending up to 500 words to


Recruitment AdTo receive information on booking an advertising banner please email