Supplier Spotlight

Show Reviews

Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2017 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2016 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2015 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo North America 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo India 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Latest Video

JLR heads to LA with I-Pace


Engineer Simon Patel takes potential I-Pace customer Ann Voyer on a long-distance real world road trip from Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles to Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo to test the vehicle's range and durability

Click here to watch the video

Waymo unveils self-driving cars


Waymo, which started as the Google self-driving car project in 2009, is ready for the next phase. Fully self-driving vehicles are currently being tested on public roads, without anyone in the driver’s seat.

Click here to watch the video

As vehicle developers and suppliers continue to advance their software programs, ATTI wants to know, has simulation software established itself as the single most vital piece of equipment during a development program?


« back to listing

Q&A: Torgny Ljungberg, Volvo Cars

Ahead of Automotive Testing Expo North America 2015 (October 20-22), Volvo Cars attribute leader Torgny Ljungberg talks about how the company is developing its skills in virtual validation of squeak and rattle


Please tell us the background to your presentation.
As an attribute leader at Volvo Cars I’m responsible for solidity. One of my main tasks is to prevent squeak and rattle (S&R) from occurring on future car models. We have started to develop our skills in virtual S&R verification, which includes both dynamic as well as static S&R. In the very early vehicle development phase we go through all the concepts and give our input to the responsible design engineer and project managers before the final concept is chosen. 

When a project starts and virtual CAD and CAE models are available, we start our detailed work going through all critical interfaces and ensure that they are robust enough to minimize the risk of S&R issues. We perform both static and dynamic CAE calculations in areas where we have difficult interfaces, such as in the instrument panel and door panel. 

The relative movement together with the general process tolerances (GD&T) will show if there is a risk of S&R for each interface either due to contact, which causes a ‘rattling’ noise, or tangential movement when parts are in contact due to pretension, which could cause a ‘squeak’ noise. For squeaking noise Volvo has a big material database for different material pairs and their stick-slip behavior. If pretension and relative movement is found, the material pair is located in the database which will show ‘red’ or ‘green’ stick slip behavior. The database also includes results for different climate and contact force.

For dynamic CAE calculations we use the E-line method where it’s possible to see the relative movement between two parts in the critical interfaces, such as in split lines where the risk of S&R is greater. The relative movement together with the general process tolerances will show if there is a risk of S&R for each interface, either due to contact, which causes a rattling noise, or big movement, which could cause a squeak noise.

How have companies typically performed S&R verification?
Historically, S&R verification is performed on expensive physical prototypes early in the development process. Later pre-series cars in the factory are used to verify the manufacturing process as well as the suppliers of all included parts. Currently, many issues are found late in development when it’s expensive or impossible to change the design.

Why is your method more accurate?
E-line uses normal road load and the result is an absolute movement in millimeters. Current analysis, for example Eigen Frequency/Modal analysis, is based more on several years of experience and it’s difficult to know exactly where the limit for OK/NOK is.

August 20, 2015


Read Latest Issue
Read Latest Issue

Your email address:

Web Exclusives

Safer analysis of onboard chargers

How Keysight's compact, two-quadrant, regenerative power converter test solution with integrated safety features accelerates test time, and protects both users and devices under test
Click here to read more

SEAT uses HBM autonomous DAQ system

SEAT and Polytechnic University of Catalonia (BarcelonaTech) have jointly developed a unique data acquisition enabling more precise control over instrumented parts and the entire data acquisition process  
Click here to read more

Modern calculation management

The engineering department at Hitachi Construction Truck Manufacturing is taking steps to improve its rigid-frame hauling truck design through improving its analysis tools
Click here to read more

Traveling in a Volkswagen that is still to be developed

Volkswagen Group’s IT Virtual Engineering Lab has developed a virtual concept car using digital future technology
Click here to read more

The importance of software engineering

Tier 1 supplier GKN’s software and electronics manager, Michael Schomisch, discusses how software development is becoming increasingly important in vehicle testing
Click here to read more

Supplier Spotlight

Supplier SpotlightClick here for listings and information on leading suppliers covering all aspects of the automotive testing industry. Want to see your company included? Contact for more details.

Submit your industry opinion

Industry BlogDo you have an opinion you'd like to share with the automotive testing community? Good or bad, we'd like to hear your views and opinions on the leading issues shaping the industry. Share your comments by sending up to 500 words to


Recruitment AdTo receive information on booking an advertising banner please email